Category: Highland Radio Interviews

Highland Radio Broadcast 30th August 2024. Trump v Kamala Harris Debate

With Autumn fast approaching the changes in the US political front were considered on the Greg Hughes Show with our contributor Seamus Gunn quoting “It’s all changed, changed utterly” in describing Kamala Harris’ ascent to the Democratic nomination. While back in July Donald Trump was ahead in the polls and seemed to be moving in the direction of a second term in the White House, Harris is now marginally in front following President Biden’s retirement from the race. Kamala Harris’ first interview on CNN news was referenced by our contributor who said that she was now laying out her stall which was not diametrically opposed to Biden’s agenda when he was in the contest. Seamus Gunn said that she had been a State Prosecutor in California and would be well versed in dealing with migration and would likely firm up on it while continuing to support Israel but also pushing for a settlement. He noted that inflation was coming down and he was at a loss to understand why the Trump camp were not focusing more on the economy. Greg Hughes countered by saying that his advisors could not keep him on point. Both agreed that the name calling, and personal insults were not likely to work for Trump on this occasion and that he would have to at some point back up his elaborate statements with facts. The point about her change of attitude about fracking was also made, particularly in Pennsylvania when previously she was in favour of a ban on this activity. Seamus Gunn said that it was refreshing to see that she was considering having a Republican on her cabinet which was an example of her forward-thinking mentality. 

He thought that when she would come up against Donald Trump in the first of their debates in September next, she would have the facts and figures to back up her claims, putting any general statements on his part under scrutiny. He said that the approach that the Harris camp was adopting was to portray her as a down to earth person with whom anyone could have a conversation about the issues of the day. He thought that the Trump campaign had gone somewhat flat from interpreting the body language, that the Republicans had not come to terms with the Harris candidacy. There was also reference to the incident in the Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia earlier in the week, which our contributor considered was an error on the Trump side as Federal Law prohibited taking photographs in such settings. The role of A.I. with misinformation and disinformation was also considered and the likely impact that this could have on the outcome of the election.

As it enters its final months, the race is certainly hotting up. 

The Q&A that followed is available to listen to below:

Highland Radio Broadcast 5th July 2024

Before the summer recess, the Joe Biden performance in the Atlanta debate with Donald Trump was referenced by our contributor Seamus Gunn describing it as unedifying on both sides. He thought that the handling of it by CNN left questions to be answered as there was no real time facts check run simultaneously, which may have highlighted some of the claims by Donald Trump which were untrue. He thought that it was an opportunity missed and that the Biden of some 4 years back would have honed in on Trump’s inaccuracies. One would have expected that his advisors would have been aware of his capabilities as he had been a number of days in Camp David in prep for the engagement. A point was made that he could lose it, not in the debate, but in the aftermath with his explanation of fatigue, referencing that he almost “fell asleep on stage”. Seamus Gunn was at a loss to understand why his handlers would have exposed him to this situation, with Greg Hughes countering that they had not been upfront with the electorate to date if Joe Biden was compromised in his capacity. The discussion continued with Gunn expressing surprise that the Democrats some years back did not groom an obvious successor, such as his Vice President Kamala Harris which he thought could yet occur as the sentiment was growing that Biden should stand down but to date he has indicated that he is going to continue, but this all may change, Seamus Gunn referencing an interview scheduled for later today on ABC television. No doubt as the summer moves on, there will be a lot more to play for on this stage.

A lively Q&A followed which can be listened to below

Highland Radio Broadcast 7th June 2024

With the approach of summer, the woes of Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden were discussed, while Donald Trump has his own legal troubles and more to follow, Hunter Biden is defending a prosecution in Delaware charged with 3 counts, possession of a Revolver, declaring that he wasn’t a drug user and illegally having the gun for 11 days. Greg Hughes raised the point of the evidence being circumstantial, Gunn believing that the 12th October 2018 may have some relevance for the jury in considering the evidence, in light of the discovery of the revolver days later in the glove compartment of his truck by his ex-girlfriend, previous wife of his deceased brother Beau. Seamus Gunn thought the prosecution would have to establish that he was under the influence on the date of the acquisition, while the Defence claimed that he had come out of rehab and was clean at that time. The events as described by Hallie Biden, disposing of it after she panicked, putting it into a shopping bag, going to a grocery store and throwing it in a rubbish bin only for it to be discovered by an 80-year-old senior citizen who was seeking out recyclables in the bin were bizarre in the extreme. It was also worth remarking that there had been a Plea Bargain between the parties to deal with this matter and also a Tax Charge to be tried later in the year but that this collapsed without any explanation, as far as he was aware in the public domain. In the meantime, President Biden, who was on D-Day commemoration ceremonies in France, stated that he will not pardon his son, if convicted. A verdict to follow on this within days. 

Since our broadcast, it is noted that Hunter Biden was convicted on the 11th June on all 3 counts, with sentencing to follow.

Highland Radio Broadcast 3rd May 2024

The May Day Show began with the continuing woes of ex-President Donald Trump as he defends the “hush money” allegations in a New York Court where there are 34 Criminal Counts being prosecuted against him for financial irregularities arising as a result of the payments to Adult Film Actor Stormy Daniels (Stephanie Clifford) to suppress a story which was about to break before the 2016 Presidential Election and the manner in which it was recorded in the financial records. Our contributor Seamus Gunn explained that it was Michael Cohen the ex-lawyer of Donald Trump who was alleged to have made the                  $ 130,000.00 payment to Ms. Daniles which was then repaid by a number of instalments of $ 35,000.00 each and recorded in the bookkeeping system as payments for legal expenses. He was of the view that this was the lesser of the criminal charges that were pending against Mr. Trump referring to the allegations of the attempt to overturn the Presidential Election won by Joe Biden in 2020 which are pending in Georgia and Washington and the concealment of Presidential Documents in his home in Mar-a-Lago, Florida. He said that the fraud, forgery and conspiratorial charges could attract sentences of up to 12 years or more. Greg Hughes quickly made the point that in the event that Donald Trump was successful in the forthcoming election on the 6th of November that it is highly likely that all of these matters would go away. Seamus Gunn said that this could lead to a first in that it was likely that the question would arise; could a President pardon himself? He noted that in practical terms he would not be tried during his presidential term, with the passing of time and points upon prejudice and the Statute of Limitations he thought that the charges could go into the ether. 

Greg Hughes referenced both the Republican nominee and the current President Biden in being poor choices for the electorate. Gunn reminded the listeners of what seemed to be the plan back in 2020, that Vice President Kamala Harris would step up to the plate during the term of Joe Biden and that she could become the candidate for the 2024 election. A plan which has not materialised. Greg Hughes was of the view that the sentiment may have changed in the US, that there may no longer be an appetite for a coloured female president, a point which our contributor did not necessarily agree with. He voiced that while Biden may have had some tentative plan for succession, he thought that Trump had none and that he was a one-man band, eliminating any potential talent coming through to succeed him. 

No doubt, a lot more to come on this front as we run into the summer. 

The Q&A kicked off with a medical records question and quickly led to further wide and varied queries on Succession and Tax. These can be listened to below; 

Highland Radio Broadcast 5th April 2024

The first show post Easter opened with our contributor Seamus Gunn focusing on the Report published by the Central Bank on the latest Data from the National Claims Information Database with the stark headline that while the average cost of Public and Employer Liability Claims dropped by a third in 2022, premiums increased by 8%. He said that this was yet another report on the insurance industry that he did not believe was addressing the issues and the difficulties that the premium increases give rise to in small businesses, commercial activities, voluntary community and sporting groups and those that are relying on such insurance. He said that the market was too restricted and condensed, that there was a lack of competition while providers have been leaving the market in recent times. He focused on the point that has been made for some time that it was the level of claims that had been driving up premiums. He was of the view that this argument could no longer be sustained. He referenced the books of quantum that were introduced by PIAB over the years from 2003.

The Judicial Council in 2021 introduced new guidelines which Gunn said were the subject of a challenge currently running in the Supreme Court, but regardless of this he believed that the net effect of the latest guidelines would be to drive up claims as the awards based on them coming from the now Injuries Resolution Board (formerly PIAB) were so low that they were being challenged through the Courts and in a lot of instances, successfully, thereby fixing the Injuries Resolution Board with Higher Damages. The knock-on effect was that this added significantly to legal costs. Our contributor was of the view that the Book of Quantum preceding 2021 was adequate and he made the point that the current study and report while refencing the year 2022, most of the claims, 76%, referenced the old Book of Quantum and this still resulted in a reduction by a third to the cost of claims in the public and employer liability sector. He said that his prediction that if the guidelines were not struck down in the Supreme Court, then they would result in further litigation as the awards currently were inadequate. He said that time would tell. It was suggested that it was a matter that should be addressed to some of the leading insurance companies to explain how awards coming down were not being converted to savings on premiums. 

As always, a very broad Q&A followed. 

Postscript, since the show on the 5th of April the Supreme Court have upheld the latest Judicial Guidelines as introduced by the Judicial Council in 2021.

Highland Radio Broadcast 1st March 2024

On the first day of Spring the US Presidential race was focused on by Seamus Gunn and Greg Hughes in particular our contributor highlighting the various different cases pending against Donald Trump and his attempt to have them delayed/postponed until the election race is run. He referenced the key strategy being adopted, the most recent being Donald Trumps’s claim to immunity from prosecution as an ex-president, a claim which our contributor said had failed on 2 occasions to date and was now scheduled for further hearing by the Supreme Court on the 22nd of April. He said that while, he was of the view that this was doomed to fail, it had the desired political outcome resulting in the postponement of the Election Subversion Allegation being 1 of a number of Criminal Trials that remain ongoing which was scheduled for the 4th of March. He said that with submissions and adjudication thereafter this could bring this matter into the summer. He was of the view that if this was the outcome then it was highly unlikely that a Criminal Prosecution would proceed before the election took place in November as it was not customary for presidential candidates to be pursued in this manner in the last months before an election, however referencing that these were unchartered waters. He said parallel to this there was the ballot eligibility cases, 3 States having ruled that Donald Trump was not eligible for the ballot due to the 14th Constitutional Amendment to prevent anyone involved in insurrection standing for election. He said he was never in favour of this argument as this case remained unproved. He said that when it was heard on the 8th of February the Supreme Court were sceptical and he anticipated that when a ruling was handed down the decisions of Illinois, Colorado and Maine would be reversed, thus giving a further boost to the Trump campaign. Greg Hughes referenced the ageism issues now being raised in respect of both camps. Our contributor was of the view that the candidates were evenly matched on age, with only 4 years between them. He thought it was remiss of both the republicans and the democrats that they did not bring forward a candidate that would appeal to a younger generation. He said that it was going to be the middle ground that would decide the election and considered that it was the candidate who was disliked the least that would be successful, only time will tell…

Highland Radio Broadcast 2nd February 2024

To kickstart Spring, The Criminal Justice (Incitement to violence or hatred and hate offenses) Bill 2022 was debated this morning with our contributor Seamus Gunn comparing the latest proposed legislation to the Incitement to Hatred Act of 1989, drawing distinctions in the particular Defences open to a prosecution in respect of the latter as against the new proposed legislation which is currently before the Senate, having passed though the Dáil prior to Christmas, without any major issues. 

He said that this was all in the context of the riots in November last, for which there were 2 persons now charged before the Courts. He said that he was of the view that knee-jerk legislation can give rise to difficulties going forward so it was best that the matter was stalled and as it is now at the committee stage in the Senate. There were some issues with which he had reservations. He agreed that the old legislation was not fit for purpose in the current digital media world and that prosecutions were problematic in this area up to now as intention had to be established on the part of the publisher of threatening, abusive or insulting material, that it was likely to stir up hatred against a group of people. Greg Hughes referenced the protective characteristics which are cited in the new legislation to include race, colour, nationality, descent, religion, ethnic or national origin, gender, sexual orientation or disability. Our contributor said that he was of the view that the thrust of the legislation was to make it easier to call people to account before the Courts and to secure convictions. He was however concerned about a particular section which gave powers to the Gardai in relation to warrants to enter individual’s private homes and seize media devices to include phones, computers, etc. and also the power to obtain passwords for these devices from the individual suspected of having content, whether or not it was communicated, that could give rise to a charge for incitement to violence or hatred. He made it clear that free speech was protected in the proposed legislation but that there were difficulties with situations where an individual could innocently have received a text or message on social media, retained it and as a result were therefore committing an offence. He said that people were still entitled to voice offensive opinions on such matters and to make others feel uncomfortable, but this did not extend to voicing or broadcasting such opinions that, on any reasonable interpretation, could give rise to inciting hatred in others. He said that there was a thin line between the 2 but he thought that it was necessary to have this deterrent on the Statue Books. Greg Hughes and Seamus Gunn agreed that such issues should be debated, and Gunn thought they should be objectively assessed and if this legislation worked as a warning for one to take stock and consider the consequences of their actions for others, this would be a step in the right direction. But he had reservations about the implementation and policing of it going forward. More to follow as the Bill has not yet been enacted. 

Highland Radio Broadcast – 5th January 2024

The year commenced as it had ended with a busy, wide and varied exchange between Greg Hughes and our contributor Seamus Gunn which kicked off with the headline story of the day being the release of Oscar Pistorius from the department of correctional services in South Africa having served 50% of his 13 years and 5 months for the murder of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp in 2013, when he discharged a firearm, firing 4 shots through the door of the couple’s bathroom, Pistorius claiming that he mistook her for an intruder. 

Seamus Gunn reviewed the background to the Pistorius fall from grace, having risen to great heights through his sporting achievements and the manner in which he championed the cause of the disabled, particularly their role in sport. He outlined that not only had he achieved success at 3 Para Olympics, winning 7 Gold Medals, he also qualified in 2012 for the able-bodied athletes Olympics in London, having first been denied entry by the World Athletics Association, a decision which he appealed. He said that he could be considered to be one of the greatest athletes of all time as in the Olympics in London he qualified for the semifinal in the 400 metres despite his disadvantage. He was of the view that he had earned his parole, as initially he was convicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to 5 years. He was then released on parole after 1 year, when his conviction was appealed, to be found guilty of murder. After a sentence of 6 years was imposed, he returned to prison, this was then appealed, and a 13-year prison term was the revised penalty. He said that he has participated in all programmes that would have qualified him for early release and he referenced the Restorative Justice Programme, part of which involved him meeting the victim’s father Barry Steenkamp in 2022. He said that despite being released, he would be under supervision and would still have restrictions imposed on him, that he could not participate in media events until the term of the full sentence had expired in 2029. Seamus Gunn was of the view that it was likely film material in the future, Greg Hughes thinking that this may already be under way. He referenced how magnanimous Reeva Steenkamp’s Mother was in accepting the release and praising the parole board’s efforts, making the telling point that while she was not convinced that he had rehabilitated, she had to move on with her life. It was understood that he would now live with his uncle in Pretoria under the terms of his parole. Seamus Gunn finished by saying that he anticipated that there would be another chapter in the life of Oscar Pistorius and wondered what future challenges he would face. 

The variety of the Q&A that followed has remained consistent as it finished in 2023 and can be listed to below.

Highland Radio Broadcast 1st December 2023

As we move into December the topic engaging many in the public arena over this past 8 days has been the riots in the streets of Dublin on the night of the 23rd November. Our contributor Seamus Gunn today highlighted the changes in policing that have been brought forward and implemented since the night in question which seen an unprecedented situation develop in the inner city. He said that given the limitations and the fact that such a scene has never been witnessed before, the Gardai had to be commended for the manner in which they contained and defused the riot which was in the aftermath of an atrocity outside a school when 3 children and a carer were stabbed. He was of the view that this could be the catalyst for change within the rank and file and in policing such incidents in the future. He said that it was remarkable that changes that were long needed have more or less been brought in overnight, such as tasers, water cannon, helmets and body cameras. He referenced the recent passing of legislation to allow body cameras to be used by members.

Greg Hughes made the point that for some time on social media this had been brewing and that it was Drew Harris’ failing to take criticism before the Dáil Committee that was an issue in itself. Our contributor thought that in light of the circumstances, as the incident developed on the night in question, as it was impossible to predict that the stabbing incident could have been used in a manner to promote an unlawful assembly for the purpose of a riot, the manpower required would not have been known. He said that it was an evolving situation, which was being dealt with as it did arise. He was of the view that members of the force were put in harm’s way and that they were ill equipped to deal with it, being sent in to defuse a riot without as much as a helmet provided. Our contributor thought if nothing else came of it but that basic riot apparel as needed by members would now be put in place, then this would be progress. The implementation of the Digital Services Act was a positive and that Ireland was the first country to trigger an alert under this new piece of EU Legislation addressing online hate speech. This involves the European Commission in contacting social media platforms warning them of their obligations under the new legislation. He said that it was worth noting that it was only Meta who had Irish speaking moderators, hence it was easy for those who were intent in participating in the riot to communicate on other platforms who did not have Irish Moderators, referencing X (Twitter), Google and YouTube. Greg Hughes had reservations about how intrusive this could be as it could lead to policing of ordinary texts between private individuals. Our contributor made the point of balancing civil liberties as against policing traffic of online hate speech and the media platforms had to have some responsibility in reporting such activity. There is likely to be a lot more debate on the Public Order implications rising out of the events of the 23rd November last. 

The usual varied Q&A that followed can be listed to online.

Highland Radio Broadcast 3rd November 2023

As we head into the winter months, the hot legal topic being covered in the media was addressed by Seamus Gunn, with Donal Kavanagh, being the running sentencing hearing in a North Carolina Court of Molly Martens Corbett and Tom Martens following their Manslaughter Pleas in respect of the death of Jason Corbett in August 2015. It was remarked by Donal Kavanagh how the sentencing hearing is being approached in a different manner than would be in similar cases in this jurisdiction. To some degree the deceased’s character was being put on Trial. Our contributor Seamus Gunn raised the points being focused on by the Defence who have continued to put forward a self-defence theory in mitigation and in support of it, putting the spotlight on the deceased with the allegations of domestic violence, following statements from his 2 children Sarah and Jack days after the event and the fear that his wife Molly Martens Corbett claimed to have for her own life as she believed that he had killed his first wife as far back as 2006. It was explained how a top pathologist had reviewed the postmortem reports in respect of her death and concluded that they did not disclose any cause of death. He ruled out the asthma theory as the cause of death, being critical of the manner in which the postmortem was carried out and believed that it was possible that it could have been strangulation. It was stressed that he was not putting forward this proposition but agreeing as a possibility while at the same time discounting the theory that the deceased was attempting to strangle Molly Martens Corbett on the night in question, which gave rise to the attack on him with a baseball bat in respect of Tom Martens and a brick in respect of his daughter. Our contributor thought that it was a difficult case to assess, that the emphasis by way of mitigation was being put on the deceased and his history in the marriage which in the first instance was corroborated by his children who then rescinded their statements both in Ireland and in the US. The question of influence was also addressed, and Seamus Gunn was of the view that this cut both ways, that if there was a theory of coaching in respect of the aftermath of the crime in the USA then that could also apply to the situation when the statements were withdrawn in Ireland. He said that there may be evidence to come on the actual recanting of the Statements. Our contributor also highlighted the difficult position that the 2 children Sarah and Jack found themselves in and he had some concerns on the impact this may have on them going forward. 

He pointed out that if aggravated circumstances were found which could be interpreted on the basis of the children being in the house at the time, then the sentencing could range from 6-9 years but that if this was not the case and the mitigation Pleas were accepted then the sentence could be as low as 3 years, but this was entirely up the to the Presiding Judge to decide based on the evidence which had not all yet been heard. He said that if it was on the low scale that as both of the accused had already served upwards of 3 and a half years, they could walk free after the sentencing hearing. As there is further evidence to follow, we wait to see how it plays out. 

The Q&A followed as usual, spanning a number of topics, which can be listened to below.